Compare
Licentric vs Keygen
An honest, side-by-side comparison so you can pick the right licensing platform for your team. Keygen facts sourced from keygen.sh/about public material (self-funded, profitable, intentionally small team, est. 2016; licensing + artifact distribution; no enterprise sales calls / no hidden pricing / no revenue cuts), verified 2026-05-21. Includes 'when to choose Keygen' scenarios — written by the Licentric founder.
TL;DR
- Choose Keygen if: you need 10+ language SDKs today (Ruby, Elixir, Swift, .NET, Java), you require 5+ years of production-stability evidence for procurement, or you want a fully self-hosted server from day 1 via Keygen CE.
- Choose Licentric if: you want license keys + Stripe billing in one product (zero webhook glue code), you're shipping or planning to ship AI agents that customers pay for, you need a full admin dashboard on the Free tier, or you want native container-aware fingerprinting for Docker/K8s.
| Aspect | Keygen | Licentric |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Cloud paid tiers + free Dev tier (up to 100 ALUs) + Keygen CE (open source) | Free tier (100 licenses), then $5 / $29 / $199 (CAD, monthly) |
| Integration | REST API, 10+ SDK languages | REST API + TypeScript/Python SDKs (Go in-repo) |
| Setup time | 1-4 hours (Cloud), DIY for CE | About 10 minutes (15 with signup) |
| Admin dashboard | Cloud: basic UI; CE: API-only | Full dashboard on every tier including Free |
| Stripe integration | Webhook handlers — your code | Declarative mapping in dashboard; zero webhook code |
| Offline licensing | Cryptographic license files supported | Ed25519-signed + AES-256-GCM encrypted, configurable TTL |
| Machine fingerprinting | Built-in (hardware-based) | Built-in + Docker/K8s logical-ID aware |
| Self-service portal | Cloud paid tiers (Distribution) | All tiers including Free |
| AI agent monetization | Not supported | Agent identity + token budgets + MCP auth (early) |
| Usage metering & billing | Add a separate vendor (e.g., Stigg, Metronome) | Built-in metering + Stripe billing sync |
| Open-source server | Keygen CE — FCL with Apache 2.0 conversion clause | Proprietary server; SDKs are MIT |
| SDK language coverage | Ruby, Python, JS, Go, Java, .NET, Swift, Elixir, C, PHP | Python + TypeScript (Go in-repo, not yet published) |
| Multi-tenancy | Account-scoped data isolation | Postgres RLS on every one of 27 tables |
| Audit trail | Standard activity logs | Append-only per-record audit logs, immutable |
| Webhook reliability | HMAC-signed deliveries | HMAC-SHA256 + 3-retry exponential backoff |
| Rate limiting | Per-key, plan-tiered | Per-IP + per-API-key + per-license-key tiers |
| Custom branding | Enterprise tier | Starter tier and up |
| API surface | Comprehensive REST | 93 v1 endpoints across 52 route files (OpenAPI 3.1 spec) |
| Encryption suite | Ed25519 or RSA license signatures | Ed25519 (FIPS 186-5) + AES-256-GCM + HMAC-SHA256 |
| GDPR readiness | Public DPA | Article 17 erasure + Article 20 export verified per release |
| SOC 2 Type II | Cloud Enterprise — certified | Pursuing 2026-Q4 (uncertified today) |
| Maturity | 8+ years, battle-tested | Newer, actively developed |
Transparency note
Where Keygen has the edge
We believe in transparency. Here's an honest read of where Keygen is the better fit today.
- Keygen has 8+ years of production usage and battle-tested stability at scale.
- Keygen offers SDKs in more languages including Ruby, Elixir, Swift, .NET, Java, and Go.
- Keygen Cloud Enterprise is SOC 2 Type II compliant today; Licentric is pursuing certification.
- Keygen has a larger community with more third-party integrations and tooling.
- Keygen CE is open-source from day 1 (Fair Source License with an Apache 2.0 conversion clause) — full self-hosted control.
- Keygen's policy graph (Product → Policy → License → Machine → User → Entitlement → Component) is more granular for complex licensing models.
- Keygen has documented case studies in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, gaming).
- Keygen ships SDK packages on more language ecosystems out of the box (gem, NuGet, Maven, Hex).
Choose Keygen when…
- You need Ruby, Elixir, Swift, .NET, or Java SDKs today.
- You require 5+ years of production-stability evidence for procurement.
- You want fully self-hosted from day 1 (Keygen CE).
- You have a complex policy hierarchy and prefer Keygen's explicit graph model.
- You don't need Stripe auto-sync (or have your own billing infrastructure already).
- You're not planning to ship AI agents or sell agent-based products.
- You need SOC 2 Type II compliance evidence today (not at end-of-year).
- You have an existing Keygen integration and migration cost outweighs the difference.
Choose Licentric when…
- You want license keys + Stripe billing in one product with zero webhook glue code.
- You ship AI agents and need per-agent token budgets, identity, or MCP auth.
- You want a full admin dashboard on every tier including Free.
- You're starting in 2026+ and want native container-aware fingerprinting for Docker/K8s.
- You want a generous free tier (100 active licenses, full API, no credit card).
- You want a built-in end-user self-service portal on every tier.
- You want offline files signed with Ed25519 (FIPS 186-5, deterministic, 64-byte signatures).
- You want compliance scaffolding for the EU AI Act (phased enforcement starting August 2026).
Already on Keygen? Licentric imports Keygen CSV exports directly — license keys preserve their identifiers, machines re-fingerprint on first contact, and dual-write keeps both platforms validating the same keys during a 30-day overlap.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about choosing between Keygen and Licentric.
- Is Licentric a Keygen fork?
- No. Licentric is an independent codebase built on Next.js + Supabase. Keygen is Ruby on Rails. Licentric was started as a unified monetization platform (licensing + entitlements + metering + agent identity), not as a derivative of any other product. The comparison reflects two parallel projects pointed at different scopes.
- Can I switch back to Keygen if Licentric doesn't work out?
- Yes. Licentric supports full data export via the dashboard and the REST API. Both platforms accept standard CSV imports, so a return migration is symmetric to the inbound one. We recommend a 30-day overlap window during cutover — both platforms can validate the same keys simultaneously while you switch SDK targets.
- Does Licentric support self-hosted deployments?
- Today: SaaS only. A self-hosted compiled-binary option is on the Year 2 roadmap (per VISION.md), once enterprise demand is validated by at least 5 customer requests. If self-hosted is a hard requirement for your procurement process right now, Keygen CE is the immediate answer — it has been open-source for years and is production-deployed by enterprise customers.
- How does Licentric compare on integration speed?
- Licentric averages about 10 minutes from signup to first validated license (15 minutes if you count the signup flow). The fast path: install the SDK, copy the snippet from the dashboard, run validate(). Keygen Cloud averages 1-4 hours depending on whether you need offline files, custom policies, or webhook handlers for Stripe.
- Does Licentric have a self-service portal like Keygen Distribution?
- Yes — an end-user portal with device management, key recovery, and machine transfer is included on every tier including Free. Keygen's Distribution offering is gated to enterprise tiers on Cloud. End-user-facing flows in Licentric use magic-link auth so customers don't need a separate password to your portal.
- Will Licentric support more SDK languages?
- Yes. The Go SDK exists in-repo today (not yet published to a registry). Rust, .NET, Java, and Swift are on the Phase 2 roadmap per VISION.md. If a specific language is blocking your evaluation, email able@licentric.com — concrete demand is one of the trigger criteria for pulling a language forward.
Ready to try Licentric?
Start free with 100 licenses.
No credit card.
Migrate from Keygen with a single CSV.